Would green deal achieve objectives by 2020 Dissertation

Would green deal achieve objectives by 2020 - Dissertation Example If the environment suffers, there is every possibility that every human activity will suffer in the short as well as in the long run. The discussion aims at underpinning and exploring the scheme set out by the conservative party to reduce green gas emission in the United Kingdom. It is important to understand the nature and influence of greenhouse gas before underpinning the policies and agendas of the conservative party in the United Kingdom. Greenhouse Gas is available in the atmosphere that not only assimilates but also emits radiation that can be pretty harmful in terms of increasing the overall temperature of the earth. The primary greenhouse gases are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, ozone and nitrous oxide. All these gases are produced in the environment from different natural and industrial activities. All these gases also cause Greenhouse Effect where radiation from the surface is assimilated by these gases and is spreaded in all directions causing an increase in the te mperature that often creates detrimental impact over the earth and its sources and resources. There is no denying that there has been an increase in the greenhouse gas emission largely after the industrial revolution. A large number of industries were mushrooming in different parts of the world causing a rise in greenhouse gases emissions along with an increase in the earth’s temperature at an alarming rate (The Independent, (2008) A number of countries have tried taking initiatives in order to reduce the greenhouse gas emission along with saving the earth for a long period of time. This shows that the world is serious in protecting the earth by understanding the overall impact of greenhouse gases. One of the highly admired initiatives that have been taken in order to combat the aftermath of green gas emission is in the form of Kyoto Protocol. It is a protocol to the UNFCC directed at controlling the global through natural and mutual initiatives. As of 2011, 191 states have s igned the protocol and United States has not signed the protocol. This can be considered as quite staggering considering the reality that the United States is the super power and a large number of multinational organsiations are based in and around the United States. As a matter of fact, more than 30 countries have committed to control and reduce the emission of green gases that will help in lowering the ever increasing temperature of the earth (Murray, 2011) It needs to be mentioned that every country wants to strengthen its image and reputation in the global world by creating value and using sources and resources in an effective and efficient manner. The increase in the number of industries across the world especially in the developed and developing countries has resulted in the emission of green gases that is not only an alarming sign but also a danger for the business and social environment in the present as well as in the future. The top ten countries emitting green house gases at an alarming rate are China, the USA, India, European Union, Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, Japan, Canada and Mexico. All these countries have large number of industries engaged in the production of different goods and services catering to the needs and demands of millions of consumers across the world. However, these countries are also posing great threat for the humanity in terms of emitting gases that are really harmful for humans in order to survive (Murray, 2011) It is important to take initiatives in order to reduce the emission of these gases along with creating awareness that will help in creating a favorable environment all across the world along with saving

Stem cell success Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Stem cell success - Term Paper Example This enthusiasm still is not shared by those of the religious right. This faction is opposed to embryonic stem cell research which they claim as immoral and characterize as devaluing human life, much the same as does abortion, drawing a link between the two. This discussion will provide a brief overview of stem cell research and its benefits to society, the debate surrounding the issue and the arguments for continued research. Stem cells are basically the building block cells of a human being which are capable of becoming 210 different types of tissue. Adult stem cells are found in minute numbers within most tissues, but the majority of stem cells can be obtained from the umbilical cord. There are numerous potential sources for stem cells. Embryonic stem cells originate from the inner cell of an early stage embryo. Embryonic germ cells can be collected from fetal tissue at a later stage of development. Adult stem cells can be obtained from mature tissues. â€Å"Even after complete m aturation of an organism, cells need to be replaced. A good example (of adult stem cells) is blood, but this is true for muscle and other connective tissue as well, and may be true for at least some nervous system cells† (Chapman et al, 1999). ... It has been substantiated from animal research that stem cells can be differentiated into cells that will behave appropriately in their transplanted location. For example, the transplantation of stem cells following treatments for cancer has found much success for many years. â€Å"Experiments such as the transplantation of fetal tissue into the brains of Parkinson’s patients indicate that the expectation that stem cell therapies could provide robust treatments for many human diseases is a reasonable one. It is only through controlled scientific research that the true promise will be understood† (Frankel, 1999). The moral dilemma that surrounds the prohibition of aborted fetuses is the idea of abortion itself. The former Bush administration was very conservative leaning and made it very clear that it was opposed to legal abortions, in at least most circumstances, and transferred that ideology to its prohibition of embryonic stem cell research. The concept of scientific study of the next stage of development, the fetus, which resulted from an abortion, is unthinkable. This ideology of that administration reflected the minority opinion which opposes abortion and also reflects the majority opinion that is opposed to aborted fetuses of consenting parents being used for experimentation. This reality has no basis in reason. Why would those who claim to be ‘pro-choice’ want to waste the aborted tissue? For that matter, why would pro-lifers want to witness what they believe is a living being tossed away in vain? At least its ‘life’ could have meant something to humanity in a very real way. Though president Obama reversed the Bush-era restrictions on this scientific research, conservatives continue to fight this battle in court. Last